

An edition of The original compromise (2012)
what the Constitution's framers were really thinking
By David Brian Robertson
Publish Date
2012
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Language
eng
Pages
344
Description:
The eighty-five famous essays by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay--known collectively as the Federalist Papers--compose the lens through which we typically view the ideas the U.S. Constitution. But we are wrong to do so, writes David Robertson, if we really want to know what the Founders were thinking. In this provocative new account of the framing of the Constitution, Roberston observes that the Federalist Papers represented only one side in a fierce argument that was settled by compromise--in fact, multiple compromises. Drawing on numerous primary sources, Robertson unravels the highly political dynamics that shaped the document. Brilliantly argued and deeply researched, this book will change the way we think of "original intent." With a bracing willingness to challenge old pieties, Robertson rescues the political realities that created the government we know today. -- Provided by publsiher, inside flaps.
subjects: Politics and government, Constitutional history, Philosophy, United States, United States. Constitutional Convention (1787), Political science, History, United states, constitutional convention (1787), Political science, united states, Constitutional history, united states, United states, politics and government, 1783-1809, Political science--history, Political science--united states--history--18th century, Constitutional history--united states, Politics and government--philosophy, Ja84.u5 r54 2013, 320.473
Places: United States
Times: 1783-1789, 18th century